Garnell vs Garrett
American parents have registered 136,214 Garretts since 1880, against 505 Garnells. Garrett is still ahead, with 526 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Garnell Garrett
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Garrett has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1922, when Garnell had 20 and Garrett had 93.
Side by side
| Garnell | Garrett | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 505 | 136,214 |
| Most in one year | 20 | 5,850 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 526 |
| Estimated living today | 260 | 128,000 |
| Median age today | 63 | 28 |
| Peak year | 1964 | 2000 |
| Best rank | 2,114th boys | 74th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 564th |
| First recorded | 1912 | 1880 |
| Girls / boys | 99 / 406 | 452 / 135,762 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Garnells alive today are over 63; half the Garretts are over 28. That is 35 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Garnell and Garrett.