Gaspar vs Gasper
American parents have registered 2,211 Gaspars since 1880, against 1,469 Gaspers. Gaspar is still ahead, with 40 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Gaspar Gasper
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 117 years in which either name was published, Gaspar for 66 years and Gasper for 51 years. The lead changed hands 13 times.
8 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Gaspar | Gasper | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 2,211 | 1,469 |
| Most in one year | 50 | 48 |
| Babies in 2025 | 40 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 1,700 | 420 |
| Median age today | 25 | 65 |
| Peak year | 2024 | 1917 |
| Best rank | 2,637th boys | 919th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 3,036th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1911 | 1907 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 2,211 | 0 / 1,469 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Gaspers alive today are over 65; half the Gaspars are over 25. That is 40 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Gaspar Texas (3.9×), California (3.7×), New York (2.5×)
- Gasper New York (10.6×), Michigan (1.8×), New Jersey (1.1×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Gaspar and Gasper.