Humanverse

Gloriana vs Glorianna

American parents have registered 803 Glorianas since 1880, against 528 Gloriannas. But in 2025 it was Glorianna that was commoner, 15 babies to 14.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Gloriana against Glorianna, 1880 to 2025 0 10 20 30 40 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Gloriana Glorianna

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 72 years in which either name was published, Gloriana for 45 years and Glorianna for 27 years. The lead changed hands 28 times.

21 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Gloriana Glorianna
Total US births 803528
Most in one year 3722
Babies in 2025 1415
Estimated living today 760470
Median age today 1419
Peak year 20182012
Best rank 3,918th girls5,895th girls
Rank in 2025 7,491st7,133rd
First recorded 19291921
Girls / boys 803 / 0528 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Gloriannas alive today are over 19; half the Glorianas are over 14. That is 5 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Gloriana and Glorianna.