Humanverse

Griffith vs Grisel

American parents have registered 1,678 Grisels since 1880, against 1,550 Griffiths. But in 2025 it was Griffith that was commoner, 22 babies to 7.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Griffith against Grisel, 1880 to 2025 0 60 120 180 240 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Griffith Grisel

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 113 years in which either name was published, Griffith for 66 years and Grisel for 47 years. The lead changed hands 16 times.

11 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Griffith Grisel
Total US births 1,5501,678
Most in one year 26211
Babies in 2025 227
Estimated living today 1,1001,600
Median age today 3140
Peak year 19181984
Best rank 1,404th boys784th girls
Rank in 2025 4,539th11,932nd
First recorded 18991954
Girls / boys 0 / 1,5501,671 / 7

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Grisels alive today are over 40; half the Griffiths are over 31. That is 9 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Griffith and Grisel.