Humanverse

Guss vs Gust

American parents have registered 1,871 Gusts since 1880, against 1,136 Gusses. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Guss against Gust, 1880 to 2025 0 15 30 45 60 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Guss Gust

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 98 years in which either name was published, Gust for 84 years and Guss for 14 years. The lead changed hands 18 times.

12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Guss Gust
Total US births 1,1361,871
Most in one year 3959
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 110290
Median age today 7568
Peak year 19201923
Best rank 1,139th boys882nd boys
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18801880
Girls / boys 0 / 1,1360 / 1,871

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Gusses alive today are over 75; half the Gusts are over 68. That is 7 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Guss and Gust.