Humanverse

Gwyndolyn vs Gwynne

American parents have registered 1,433 Gwynnes since 1880, against 519 Gwyndolyns. But in 2025 it was Gwyndolyn that was commoner, 6 babies to 6.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Gwyndolyn against Gwynne, 1880 to 2025 0 13 25 38 50 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Gwyndolyn Gwynne

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 102 years in which either name was published, Gwynne for 73 years and Gwyndolyn for 29 years. The lead changed hands 15 times.

11 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Gwyndolyn Gwynne
Total US births 5191,433
Most in one year 1648
Babies in 2025 66
Estimated living today 4301,100
Median age today 3062
Peak year 19521951
Best rank 2,671st girls1,339th girls
Rank in 2025 13,208th13,208th
First recorded 19241920
Girls / boys 519 / 01,403 / 30

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Gwynnes alive today are over 62; half the Gwyndolyns are over 30. That is 32 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Gwyndolyn and Gwynne.