Harl vs Harper
American parents have registered 145,832 Harpers since 1880, against 601 Harls. Harper is still ahead, with 6,869 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Harl Harper
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 135 years in which either name was published, Harper for 123 years and Harl for 12 years. The lead changed hands 17 times.
- 1881–2025 Harper ahead, apart from 5 short spells
12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Harl | Harper | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 601 | 145,832 |
| Most in one year | 23 | 11,102 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 6,869 |
| Estimated living today | 150 | 144,000 |
| Median age today | 74 | 8 |
| Peak year | 1920 | 2016 |
| Best rank | 1,592nd boys | 11th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 16th |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1881 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 601 | 139,063 / 6,769 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Harls alive today are over 74; half the Harpers are over 8. That is 66 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Harl and Harper.