Humanverse

Hildred vs Hilma

American parents have registered 2,999 Hilmas since 1880, against 2,825 Hildreds. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Hildred against Hilma, 1880 to 2025 0 30 60 90 120 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Hildred Hilma

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 85 years in which either name was published, Hildred for 44 years and Hilma for 41 years. The lead changed hands 12 times.

6 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Hildred Hilma
Total US births 2,8252,999
Most in one year 107105
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 330250
Median age today 8280
Peak year 19201915
Best rank 774th girls644th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18891880
Girls / boys 2,404 / 4212,999 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Hildreds alive today are over 82; half the Hilmas are over 80. That is 2 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Hildred and Hilma.