Inger vs Ingo
American parents have registered 1,372 Ingers since 1880, against 46 Ingos. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Inger Ingo
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Inger has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1888 to 1986. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1957, when Inger had 17 and Ingo had 8.
Side by side
| Inger | Ingo | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,372 | 46 |
| Most in one year | 118 | 8 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 1,000 | 40 |
| Median age today | 58 | 60 |
| Peak year | 1966 | 1957 |
| Best rank | 929th girls | 3,024th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1888 | 1957 |
| Girls / boys | 1,372 / 0 | 0 / 46 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Ingos alive today are over 60; half the Ingers are over 58. That is 2 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Inger and Ingo.