Jace vs Jacelynn
American parents have registered 92,412 Jaces since 1880, against 959 Jacelynns. Jace is still ahead, with 3,091 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Jace Jacelynn
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Jace has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1936 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2002, when Jace had 1,096 and Jacelynn had 19.
Side by side
| Jace | Jacelynn | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 92,412 | 959 |
| Most in one year | 6,446 | 75 |
| Babies in 2025 | 3,091 | 25 |
| Estimated living today | 91,000 | 950 |
| Median age today | 11 | 11 |
| Peak year | 2013 | 2015 |
| Best rank | 66th boys | 2,431st girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 114th | 5,099th |
| First recorded | 1936 | 1995 |
| Girls / boys | 868 / 91,544 | 959 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Where each one is strongest
- Jace Utah (3.2×), Idaho (2.6×), Nevada (2.4×)
- Jacelynn Louisiana (10.2×), Oklahoma (8.0×), Texas (7.2×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jace and Jacelynn.