Jackquline vs Jacob
American parents have registered 990,532 Jacobs since 1880, against 571 Jackqulines. Jacob is still ahead, with 6,152 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Jackquline Jacob
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Jacob has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1965, when Jackquline had 38 and Jacob had 487.
Side by side
| Jackquline | Jacob | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 571 | 990,532 |
| Most in one year | 40 | 36,091 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 6,152 |
| Estimated living today | 470 | 929,000 |
| Median age today | 61 | 25 |
| Peak year | 1964 | 1998 |
| Best rank | 1,867th girls | 2nd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 43rd |
| First recorded | 1931 | 1880 |
| Girls / boys | 571 / 0 | 2,305 / 988,227 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Jackqulines alive today are over 61; half the Jacobs are over 25. That is 36 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jackquline and Jacob.