Humanverse

Jacob vs Jacoby

American parents have registered 990,532 Jacobs since 1880, against 11,281 Jacobys. Jacob is still ahead, with 6,152 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Jacob against Jacoby, 1880 to 2025 0 10k 20k 30k 40k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Jacob Jacoby

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Jacob has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2013, when Jacob had 18,224 and Jacoby had 574.

Side by side

  Jacob Jacoby
Total US births 990,53211,281
Most in one year 36,091696
Babies in 2025 6,152126
Estimated living today 929,00011,000
Median age today 2516
Peak year 19982008
Best rank 2nd boys422nd boys
Rank in 2025 43rd1,425th
First recorded 18801959
Girls / boys 2,305 / 988,227120 / 11,161

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Jacobs alive today are over 25; half the Jacobys are over 16. That is 9 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Jacob Jacoby
England and Wales 95,012158

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jacob and Jacoby.