Jae vs Jaeceon
American parents have registered 2,980 Jaes since 1880, against 243 Jaeceons. Jae is still ahead, with 60 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Jae Jaeceon
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Jae has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1918 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2014, when Jae had 68 and Jaeceon had 41.
Side by side
| Jae | Jaeceon | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 2,980 | 243 |
| Most in one year | 71 | 41 |
| Babies in 2025 | 60 | 8 |
| Estimated living today | 2,700 | 240 |
| Median age today | 24 | 9 |
| Peak year | 2020 | 2014 |
| Best rank | 2,759th boys | 2,847th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 2,941st | 8,910th |
| First recorded | 1918 | 2013 |
| Girls / boys | 1,280 / 1,700 | 0 / 243 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Jaes alive today are over 24; half the Jaeceons are over 9. That is 15 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jae and Jaeceon.