Humanverse

Jamie vs Jamon

American parents have registered 359,590 Jamies since 1880, against 2,748 Jamons. Jamie is still ahead, with 824 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Jamie against Jamon, 1880 to 2025 0 5k 10k 15k 20k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Jamie Jamon

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Jamie has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1884 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2009, when Jamie had 1,434 and Jamon had 67.

Side by side

  Jamie Jamon
Total US births 359,5902,748
Most in one year 17,16094
Babies in 2025 82410
Estimated living today 335,0002,600
Median age today 4327
Peak year 19771999
Best rank 18th girls1,294th boys
Rank in 2025 857th7,679th
First recorded 18841964
Girls / boys 270,936 / 88,6546 / 2,742

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Jamies alive today are over 43; half the Jamons are over 27. That is 16 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jamie and Jamon.