Humanverse

Jamie vs Jamyla

American parents have registered 359,590 Jamies since 1880, against 744 Jamylas. Jamie is still ahead, with 824 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Jamie against Jamyla, 1880 to 2025 0 5k 10k 15k 20k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Jamie Jamyla

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Jamie has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1884 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2017, when Jamie had 804 and Jamyla had 40.

Side by side

  Jamie Jamyla
Total US births 359,590744
Most in one year 17,16043
Babies in 2025 82427
Estimated living today 335,000740
Median age today 4312
Peak year 19772011
Best rank 18th girls3,603rd girls
Rank in 2025 857th4,878th
First recorded 18841986
Girls / boys 270,936 / 88,654744 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Jamies alive today are over 43; half the Jamylas are over 12. That is 31 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jamie and Jamyla.