Jamiroquan vs Jamison
American parents have registered 22,740 Jamisons since 1880, against 13 Jamiroquans. Jamison is still ahead, with 336 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Jamiroquan Jamison
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Jamison has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1931 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1995, when Jamiroquan had 13 and Jamison had 246.
Side by side
| Jamiroquan | Jamison | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 13 | 22,740 |
| Most in one year | 13 | 756 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 336 |
| Estimated living today | 13 | 22,000 |
| Median age today | 30 | 18 |
| Peak year | 1995 | 2017 |
| Best rank | 4,508th boys | 436th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 785th |
| First recorded | 1995 | 1931 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 13 | 1,944 / 20,796 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Jamiroquans alive today are over 30; half the Jamisons are over 18. That is 12 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jamiroquan and Jamison.