Jayce vs Jaywana
American parents have registered 47,162 Jayces since 1880, against 20 Jaywanas. Jayce is still ahead, with 2,230 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Jayce Jaywana
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 65 years in which either name was published, Jayce for 64 years and Jaywana for 1 year. The lead changed hands 2 times.
Side by side
| Jayce | Jaywana | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 47,162 | 20 |
| Most in one year | 3,191 | 20 |
| Babies in 2025 | 2,230 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 47,000 | 19 |
| Median age today | 9 | 47 |
| Peak year | 2015 | 1978 |
| Best rank | 132nd boys | 3,637th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 167th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1929 | 1978 |
| Girls / boys | 1,739 / 45,423 | 20 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Jaywanas alive today are over 47; half the Jayces are over 9. That is 38 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jayce and Jaywana.