Kael vs Kaeleb
American parents have registered 4,071 Kaels since 1880, against 635 Kaelebs. Kael is still ahead, with 263 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Kael Kaeleb
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 52 years in which either name was published, Kael for 51 years and Kaeleb for 1 year. The lead changed hands 2 times.
Side by side
| Kael | Kaeleb | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 4,071 | 635 |
| Most in one year | 263 | 41 |
| Babies in 2025 | 263 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 4,000 | 630 |
| Median age today | 15 | 16 |
| Peak year | 2025 | 2008 |
| Best rank | 903rd boys | 2,879th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 903rd | unranked |
| First recorded | 1969 | 1994 |
| Girls / boys | 16 / 4,055 | 0 / 635 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Both names abroad
Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.
| Country | Kael | Kaeleb |
|---|---|---|
| England and Wales | 158 | 21 |
Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kael and Kaeleb.