Humanverse

Kee vs Keegan

American parents have registered 42,324 Keegans since 1880, against 1,416 Kees. Keegan is still ahead, with 497 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Kee against Keegan, 1880 to 2025 0 500 1k 1.5k 2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Kee Keegan

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 113 years in which either name was published, Kee for 59 years and Keegan for 54 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

Side by side

  Kee Keegan
Total US births 1,41642,324
Most in one year 441,888
Babies in 2025 under 5497
Estimated living today 60042,000
Median age today 5718
Peak year 19242007
Best rank 1,071st boys222nd boys
Rank in 2025 unranked621st
First recorded 19101965
Girls / boys 10 / 1,4063,805 / 38,519

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Kees alive today are over 57; half the Keegans are over 18. That is 39 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kee and Keegan.