Humanverse

Keeley vs Keena

American parents have registered 6,741 Keeleys since 1880, against 2,336 Keenas. Keeley is still ahead, with 135 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Keeley against Keena, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Keeley Keena

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 73 years in which either name was published, Keeley for 46 years and Keena for 27 years. The lead changed hands 9 times.

Side by side

  Keeley Keena
Total US births 6,7412,336
Most in one year 253153
Babies in 2025 135under 5
Estimated living today 6,6002,200
Median age today 2242
Peak year 20071972
Best rank 1,041st girls848th girls
Rank in 2025 1,561stunranked
First recorded 19571952
Girls / boys 6,692 / 492,195 / 141

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Keenas alive today are over 42; half the Keeleys are over 22. That is 20 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Keeley and Keena.