Kellee vs Kelsey
American parents have registered 155,738 Kelseys since 1880, against 3,730 Kellees. Kelsey is still ahead, with 349 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Kellee Kelsey
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 116 years in which either name was published, Kelsey for 104 years and Kellee for 12 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.
Side by side
| Kellee | Kelsey | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 3,730 | 155,738 |
| Most in one year | 201 | 11,882 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 349 |
| Estimated living today | 3,500 | 152,000 |
| Median age today | 46 | 31 |
| Peak year | 1978 | 1992 |
| Best rank | 767th girls | 23rd girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 814th |
| First recorded | 1951 | 1891 |
| Girls / boys | 3,714 / 16 | 150,416 / 5,322 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Kellees alive today are over 46; half the Kelseys are over 31. That is 15 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Kellee California (3.5×), Ohio (2.8×), Michigan (2.6×)
- Kelsey Alaska (2.4×), Oregon (1.8×), Washington (1.7×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kellee and Kelsey.