Humanverse

Kendra vs Kensleigh

American parents have registered 98,788 Kendras since 1880, against 952 Kensleighs. Kendra is still ahead, with 320 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Kendra against Kensleigh, 1880 to 2025 0 1k 2k 3k 4k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Kendra Kensleigh

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Kendra has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1936 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2023, when Kendra had 381 and Kensleigh had 61.

Side by side

  Kendra Kensleigh
Total US births 98,788952
Most in one year 3,86380
Babies in 2025 32034
Estimated living today 95,000950
Median age today 358
Peak year 19872018
Best rank 77th girls2,275th girls
Rank in 2025 849th4,172nd
First recorded 19361999
Girls / boys 98,438 / 350952 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Kendras alive today are over 35; half the Kensleighs are over 8. That is 27 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kendra and Kensleigh.