Kendyll vs Kenneth
American parents have registered 1,289,312 Kenneths since 1880, against 1,582 Kendylls. Kenneth is still ahead, with 1,148 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Kendyll Kenneth
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Kenneth has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2011, when Kendyll had 117 and Kenneth had 2,217.
Side by side
| Kendyll | Kenneth | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,582 | 1,289,312 |
| Most in one year | 117 | 28,145 |
| Babies in 2025 | 16 | 1,148 |
| Estimated living today | 1,600 | 779,000 |
| Median age today | 16 | 61 |
| Peak year | 2011 | 1957 |
| Best rank | 1,804th girls | 14th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 6,838th | 294th |
| First recorded | 1982 | 1880 |
| Girls / boys | 1,558 / 24 | 5,338 / 1,283,974 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Kenneths alive today are over 61; half the Kendylls are over 16. That is 45 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Kendyll Ohio (3.9×), Texas (2.9×), Indiana (2.4×)
- Kenneth Wyoming (1.5×), North Dakota (1.4×), Montana (1.4×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kendyll and Kenneth.