Kermit vs Kerrick
American parents have registered 16,472 Kermits since 1880, against 721 Kerricks. Kermit is still ahead, with 6 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Kermit Kerrick
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 122 years in which either name was published, Kermit for 104 years and Kerrick for 18 years. The lead changed hands 12 times.
9 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Kermit | Kerrick | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 16,472 | 721 |
| Most in one year | 431 | 23 |
| Babies in 2025 | 6 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 5,500 | 680 |
| Median age today | 67 | 32 |
| Peak year | 1919 | 2006 |
| Best rank | 256th boys | 4,105th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 10,695th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1900 | 1954 |
| Girls / boys | 27 / 16,445 | 0 / 721 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Kermits alive today are over 67; half the Kerricks are over 32. That is 35 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kermit and Kerrick.