Humanverse

Kermit vs Kerrington

American parents have registered 16,472 Kermits since 1880, against 1,003 Kerringtons. But in 2025 it was Kerrington that was commoner, 9 babies to 6.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Kermit against Kerrington, 1880 to 2025 0 125 250 375 500 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Kermit Kerrington

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 126 years in which either name was published, Kermit for 98 years and Kerrington for 28 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

Side by side

  Kermit Kerrington
Total US births 16,4721,003
Most in one year 43192
Babies in 2025 69
Estimated living today 5,500990
Median age today 6716
Peak year 19192009
Best rank 256th boys2,338th girls
Rank in 2025 10,695th10,107th
First recorded 19001989
Girls / boys 27 / 16,445825 / 178

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Kermits alive today are over 67; half the Kerringtons are over 16. That is 51 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kermit and Kerrington.