Khadijah vs Khaza
American parents have registered 7,603 Khadijahs since 1880, against 1,970 Khazas. But in 2025 it was Khaza that was commoner, 179 babies to 151.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Khadijah Khaza
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 64 years in which either name was published, Khadijah for 57 years and Khaza for 7 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Khadijah | Khaza | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 7,603 | 1,970 |
| Most in one year | 1,622 | 337 |
| Babies in 2025 | 151 | 179 |
| Estimated living today | 7,500 | 2,000 |
| Median age today | 30 | 3 |
| Peak year | 1994 | 2023 |
| Best rank | 184th girls | 802nd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 1,427th | 1,196th |
| First recorded | 1962 | 2014 |
| Girls / boys | 7,596 / 7 | 165 / 1,805 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Khadijahs alive today are over 30; half the Khazas are over 3. That is 27 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Khadijah New Jersey (3.1×), New York (2.5×), South Carolina (2.2×)
- Khaza Louisiana (8.4×), Alabama (4.3×), Georgia (3.9×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Khadijah and Khaza.