Khaleesi vs Khary
American parents have registered 5,537 Khaleesis since 1880, against 933 Kharys. Khaleesi is still ahead, with 410 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Khaleesi Khary
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 55 years in which either name was published, Khary for 40 years and Khaleesi for 15 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Khaleesi | Khary | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 5,537 | 933 |
| Most in one year | 565 | 58 |
| Babies in 2025 | 410 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 5,500 | 880 |
| Median age today | 6 | 41 |
| Peak year | 2018 | 1977 |
| Best rank | 547th girls | 1,144th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 689th | unranked |
| First recorded | 2011 | 1971 |
| Girls / boys | 5,537 / 0 | 5 / 928 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Kharys alive today are over 41; half the Khaleesis are over 6. That is 35 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Khaleesi Nevada (4.7×), Florida (3.0×), Arizona (2.9×)
- Khary Michigan (5.8×), New York (5.8×), Pennsylvania (2.9×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Khaleesi and Khary.