Humanverse

Kierstin vs Kierstyn

American parents have registered 3,270 Kierstins since 1880, against 2,421 Kierstyns. But in 2025 it was Kierstyn that was commoner, 12 babies to fewer than five.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Kierstin against Kierstyn, 1880 to 2025 0 50 100 150 200 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Kierstin Kierstyn

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 60 years in which either name was published, Kierstin for 41 years and Kierstyn for 19 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Kierstin Kierstyn
Total US births 3,2702,421
Most in one year 174135
Babies in 2025 under 512
Estimated living today 3,2002,400
Median age today 2620
Peak year 20052007
Best rank 1,281st girls1,645th girls
Rank in 2025 unranked8,362nd
First recorded 19661976
Girls / boys 3,270 / 02,421 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Kierstins alive today are over 26; half the Kierstyns are over 20. That is 6 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kierstin and Kierstyn.