Humanverse

Kimber vs Kimble

American parents have registered 11,666 Kimbers since 1880, against 833 Kimbles. Kimber is still ahead, with 293 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Kimber against Kimble, 1880 to 2025 0 150 300 450 600 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Kimber Kimble

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 100 years in which either name was published, Kimber for 84 years and Kimble for 16 years. The lead changed hands 15 times.

11 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Kimber Kimble
Total US births 11,666833
Most in one year 52452
Babies in 2025 293under 5
Estimated living today 11,000620
Median age today 1359
Peak year 20161966
Best rank 592nd girls1,345th boys
Rank in 2025 936thunranked
First recorded 19141913
Girls / boys 11,215 / 451232 / 601

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Kimbles alive today are over 59; half the Kimbers are over 13. That is 46 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kimber and Kimble.