Humanverse

Kimberlee vs Kimberlynn

American parents have registered 17,690 Kimberlees since 1880, against 1,113 Kimberlynns. Kimberlee is still ahead, with 29 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Kimberlee against Kimberlynn, 1880 to 2025 0 150 300 450 600 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Kimberlee Kimberlynn

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 79 years in which either name was published, Kimberlee for 72 years and Kimberlynn for 7 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.

Side by side

  Kimberlee Kimberlynn
Total US births 17,6901,113
Most in one year 57662
Babies in 2025 2920
Estimated living today 16,0001,100
Median age today 5113
Peak year 19702013
Best rank 404th girls2,769th girls
Rank in 2025 4,661st5,917th
First recorded 19471958
Girls / boys 17,690 / 01,113 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Kimberlees alive today are over 51; half the Kimberlynns are over 13. That is 38 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kimberlee and Kimberlynn.