Humanverse

Kymber vs Kymberly

American parents have registered 3,046 Kymberlys since 1880, against 1,271 Kymbers. But in 2025 it was Kymber that was commoner, 25 babies to fewer than five.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Kymber against Kymberly, 1880 to 2025 0 30 60 90 120 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Kymber Kymberly

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 71 years in which either name was published, Kymberly for 52 years and Kymber for 19 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

Side by side

  Kymber Kymberly
Total US births 1,2713,046
Most in one year 75109
Babies in 2025 25under 5
Estimated living today 1,3002,900
Median age today 1238
Peak year 20141987
Best rank 2,412th girls1,280th girls
Rank in 2025 5,099thunranked
First recorded 19851955
Girls / boys 1,271 / 03,046 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Kymberlys alive today are over 38; half the Kymbers are over 12. That is 26 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kymber and Kymberly.