Humanverse

Lakendrick vs Lakesha

American parents have registered 8,174 Lakeshas since 1880, against 861 Lakendricks. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lakendrick against Lakesha, 1880 to 2025 0 200 400 600 800 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lakendrick Lakesha

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 56 years in which either name was published, Lakesha for 34 years and Lakendrick for 22 years. The lead changed hands 5 times.

Side by side

  Lakendrick Lakesha
Total US births 8618,174
Most in one year 37679
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 8307,800
Median age today 3245
Peak year 19911978
Best rank 2,019th boys329th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19731967
Girls / boys 0 / 8618,168 / 6

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lakeshas alive today are over 45; half the Lakendricks are over 32. That is 13 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lakendrick and Lakesha.