Humanverse

Lama vs Lamont

American parents have registered 24,189 Lamonts since 1880, against 522 Lamas. Lamont is still ahead, with 47 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lama against Lamont, 1880 to 2025 0 300 600 900 1.2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lama Lamont

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Lamont has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1888 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2025, when Lama had 15 and Lamont had 47.

Side by side

  Lama Lamont
Total US births 52224,189
Most in one year 191,060
Babies in 2025 1547
Estimated living today 52021,000
Median age today 1947
Peak year 20191972
Best rank 6,176th girls214th boys
Rank in 2025 7,133rd2,718th
First recorded 19781888
Girls / boys 522 / 0165 / 24,024

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lamonts alive today are over 47; half the Lamas are over 19. That is 28 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Lama Lamont
England and Wales 769

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lama and Lamont.