Lamesha vs Lamont
American parents have registered 24,189 Lamonts since 1880, against 579 Lameshas. Lamont is still ahead, with 47 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Lamesha Lamont
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Lamont has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1888 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1990, when Lamesha had 35 and Lamont had 314.
Side by side
| Lamesha | Lamont | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 579 | 24,189 |
| Most in one year | 35 | 1,060 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 47 |
| Estimated living today | 560 | 21,000 |
| Median age today | 37 | 47 |
| Peak year | 1990 | 1972 |
| Best rank | 3,156th girls | 214th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 2,718th |
| First recorded | 1971 | 1888 |
| Girls / boys | 579 / 0 | 165 / 24,024 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Lamonts alive today are over 47; half the Lameshas are over 37. That is 10 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Lamesha Texas (10.6×)
- Lamont the District of Columbia (6.1×), Maryland (4.1×), New Jersey (2.4×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lamesha and Lamont.