Humanverse

Lana vs Lannie

American parents have registered 57,449 Lanas since 1880, against 3,424 Lannies. Lana is still ahead, with 768 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lana against Lannie, 1880 to 2025 0 400 800 1.2k 1.6k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lana Lannie

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 140 years in which either name was published, Lana for 98 years and Lannie for 42 years. The lead changed hands 11 times.

Side by side

  Lana Lannie
Total US births 57,4493,424
Most in one year 1,470158
Babies in 2025 768under 5
Estimated living today 49,0001,800
Median age today 4866
Peak year 19481949
Best rank 188th girls569th boys
Rank in 2025 406thunranked
First recorded 18851881
Girls / boys 57,434 / 151,566 / 1,858

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lannies alive today are over 66; half the Lanas are over 48. That is 18 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lana and Lannie.