Laquana vs Laquita
American parents have registered 6,400 Laquitas since 1880, against 763 Laquanas. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Laquana Laquita
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Laquita has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1930 to 2008. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2000, when Laquana had 6 and Laquita had 12.
Side by side
| Laquana | Laquita | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 763 | 6,400 |
| Most in one year | 49 | 248 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 740 | 5,600 |
| Median age today | 41 | 44 |
| Peak year | 1979 | 1983 |
| Best rank | 2,050th girls | 683rd girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1971 | 1930 |
| Girls / boys | 763 / 0 | 6,400 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Laquitas alive today are over 44; half the Laquanas are over 41. That is 3 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Laquana South Carolina (9.8×), New York (7.1×), New Jersey (4.7×)
- Laquita Tennessee (5.0×), Mississippi (4.9×), Oklahoma (4.6×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Laquana and Laquita.