Larnell vs Lars
American parents have registered 7,035 Larses since 1880, against 887 Larnells. Lars is still ahead, with 83 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Larnell Lars
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Lars has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1883 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1932, when Larnell had 10 and Lars had 10.
Side by side
| Larnell | Lars | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 887 | 7,035 |
| Most in one year | 26 | 128 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 83 |
| Estimated living today | 700 | 6,000 |
| Median age today | 46 | 32 |
| Peak year | 1990 | 2000 |
| Best rank | 2,553rd boys | 1,096th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 1,886th |
| First recorded | 1918 | 1883 |
| Girls / boys | 5 / 882 | 0 / 7,035 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Larnells alive today are over 46; half the Larses are over 32. That is 14 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Larnell Illinois (10.0×)
- Lars Washington (6.3×), Minnesota (6.0×), California (3.3×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Larnell and Lars.