Humanverse

Lashanda vs Lashawnda

American parents have registered 4,674 Lashandas since 1880, against 2,227 Lashawndas. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lashanda against Lashawnda, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lashanda Lashawnda

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 47 years in which either name was published, Lashanda for 35 years and Lashawnda for 12 years. The lead changed hands 7 times.

Side by side

  Lashanda Lashawnda
Total US births 4,6742,227
Most in one year 291118
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 4,5002,100
Median age today 4543
Peak year 19801978
Best rank 626th girls1,104th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19621967
Girls / boys 4,674 / 02,227 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lashandas alive today are over 45; half the Lashawndas are over 43. That is 2 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lashanda and Lashawnda.