Lashell vs Lashunda
American parents have registered 2,270 Lashundas since 1880, against 999 Lashells. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Lashell Lashunda
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 54 years in which either name was published, Lashunda for 28 years and Lashell for 26 years. The lead changed hands 8 times.
Side by side
| Lashell | Lashunda | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 999 | 2,270 |
| Most in one year | 42 | 148 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 950 | 2,200 |
| Median age today | 45 | 46 |
| Peak year | 1971 | 1977 |
| Best rank | 2,001st girls | 936th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1951 | 1965 |
| Girls / boys | 999 / 0 | 2,270 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Where each one is strongest
- Lashell California (3.8×)
- Lashunda Mississippi (11.8×), Alabama (6.1×), Louisiana (6.1×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lashell and Lashunda.