Laural vs Laurel
American parents have registered 48,973 Laurels since 1880, against 1,058 Laurals. Laurel is still ahead, with 372 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Laural Laurel
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Laurel has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1883 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1957, when Laural had 52 and Laurel had 1,132.
Side by side
| Laural | Laurel | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,058 | 48,973 |
| Most in one year | 52 | 1,197 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 372 |
| Estimated living today | 860 | 39,000 |
| Median age today | 60 | 49 |
| Peak year | 1957 | 1956 |
| Best rank | 1,474th girls | 241st girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 734th |
| First recorded | 1918 | 1883 |
| Girls / boys | 1,058 / 0 | 47,113 / 1,860 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Laurals alive today are over 60; half the Laurels are over 49. That is 11 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Laural California (4.5×)
- Laurel North Dakota (2.4×), Washington (2.4×), Minnesota (2.2×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Laural and Laurel.