Leandrew vs Leanne
American parents have registered 29,632 Leannes since 1880, against 1,010 Leandrews. Leanne is still ahead, with 71 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Leandrew Leanne
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 110 years in which either name was published, Leanne for 96 years and Leandrew for 14 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Leandrew | Leanne | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,010 | 29,632 |
| Most in one year | 19 | 801 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 71 |
| Estimated living today | 710 | 27,000 |
| Median age today | 42 | 48 |
| Peak year | 1959 | 1969 |
| Best rank | 1,865th boys | 321st girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 2,485th |
| First recorded | 1916 | 1929 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 1,010 | 29,627 / 5 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Leannes alive today are over 48; half the Leandrews are over 42. That is 6 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Leandrew and Leanne.