Humanverse

Lem vs Lemont

American parents have registered 1,297 Lems since 1880, against 682 Lemonts. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lem against Lemont, 1880 to 2025 0 10 20 30 40 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lem Lemont

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 123 years in which either name was published, Lem for 78 years and Lemont for 45 years. The lead changed hands 7 times.

Side by side

  Lem Lemont
Total US births 1,297682
Most in one year 3933
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 190570
Median age today 7451
Peak year 19171974
Best rank 1,062nd boys1,520th boys
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18801918
Girls / boys 0 / 1,2970 / 682

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lems alive today are over 74; half the Lemonts are over 51. That is 23 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lem and Lemont.