Linda vs Lindburgh
American parents have registered 1,458,899 Lindas since 1880, against 48 Lindburghs. Linda is still ahead, with 294 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Linda Lindburgh
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Linda has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1927, when Linda had 516 and Lindburgh had 9.
Side by side
| Linda | Lindburgh | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,458,899 | 48 |
| Most in one year | 99,908 | 9 |
| Babies in 2025 | 294 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 1.1 million | 3 |
| Median age today | 72 | 91 |
| Peak year | 1947 | 1927 |
| Best rank | 1st girls | 2,912th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 902nd | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1927 |
| Girls / boys | 1,455,143 / 3,756 | 0 / 48 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Lindburghs alive today are over 91; half the Lindas are over 72. That is 19 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Linda and Lindburgh.