Livan vs Livingston
American parents have registered 1,071 Livingstons since 1880, against 292 Livans. Livingston is still ahead, with 12 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Livan Livingston
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 103 years in which either name was published, Livingston for 90 years and Livan for 13 years. The lead changed hands 6 times.
- 1890–1996 Livingston ahead
- 1997–2003 Livan ahead
- 2004 Livingston ahead
- 2005–2006 Livan ahead
- 2007 Livingston ahead
- 2008–2011 Livan ahead
- 2013–2025 Livingston ahead
Side by side
| Livan | Livingston | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 292 | 1,071 |
| Most in one year | 66 | 29 |
| Babies in 2025 | 10 | 12 |
| Estimated living today | 290 | 580 |
| Median age today | 24 | 30 |
| Peak year | 1998 | 1917 |
| Best rank | 1,585th boys | 1,264th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 7,679th | 12,008th |
| First recorded | 1997 | 1890 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 292 | 114 / 957 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Livingstons alive today are over 30; half the Livans are over 24. That is 6 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Livan and Livingston.