Humanverse

Lon vs Lonny

American parents have registered 9,856 Lons since 1880, against 6,413 Lonnys. But in 2025 it was Lonny that was commoner, 5 babies to fewer than five.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lon against Lonny, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lon Lonny

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 145 years in which either name was published, Lon for 101 years and Lonny for 44 years. The lead changed hands 31 times.

24 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Lon Lonny
Total US births 9,8566,413
Most in one year 274213
Babies in 2025 under 55
Estimated living today 5,3004,700
Median age today 6460
Peak year 19481957
Best rank 411th boys531st boys
Rank in 2025 unranked12,008th
First recorded 18801920
Girls / boys 20 / 9,83656 / 6,357

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lons alive today are over 64; half the Lonnys are over 60. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lon and Lonny.