Humanverse

London vs Lonell

American parents have registered 54,779 Londons since 1880, against 786 Lonells. London is still ahead, with 863 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: London against Lonell, 1880 to 2025 0 1k 2k 3k 4k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

London Lonell

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 116 years in which either name was published, London for 88 years and Lonell for 28 years. The lead changed hands 12 times.

8 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  London Lonell
Total US births 54,779786
Most in one year 3,87927
Babies in 2025 863under 5
Estimated living today 54,000560
Median age today 1251
Peak year 20131980
Best rank 85th girls2,003rd boys
Rank in 2025 431stunranked
First recorded 18861918
Girls / boys 44,455 / 10,32423 / 763

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lonells alive today are over 51; half the Londons are over 12. That is 39 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: London and Lonell.