Humanverse

Lonnell vs Lonny

American parents have registered 6,413 Lonnys since 1880, against 1,115 Lonnells. Lonny is still ahead, with 5 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lonnell against Lonny, 1880 to 2025 0 60 120 180 240 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lonnell Lonny

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 102 years in which either name was published, Lonny for 83 years and Lonnell for 19 years. The lead changed hands 14 times.

11 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Lonnell Lonny
Total US births 1,1156,413
Most in one year 33213
Babies in 2025 under 55
Estimated living today 9604,700
Median age today 4560
Peak year 19701957
Best rank 1,462nd boys531st boys
Rank in 2025 unranked12,008th
First recorded 19271920
Girls / boys 0 / 1,11556 / 6,357

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lonnys alive today are over 60; half the Lonnells are over 45. That is 15 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lonnell and Lonny.