Lora vs Loretha
American parents have registered 52,484 Loras since 1880, against 1,792 Lorethas. Lora is still ahead, with 58 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Lora Loretha
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Lora has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1935, when Lora had 274 and Loretha had 38.
Side by side
| Lora | Loretha | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 52,484 | 1,792 |
| Most in one year | 1,598 | 45 |
| Babies in 2025 | 58 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 35,000 | 1,000 |
| Median age today | 58 | 67 |
| Peak year | 1963 | 1954 |
| Best rank | 213th girls | 1,505th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 2,895th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1910 |
| Girls / boys | 52,235 / 249 | 1,792 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Lorethas alive today are over 67; half the Loras are over 58. That is 9 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Lora West Virginia (3.5×), Kentucky (2.6×), Indiana (2.2×)
- Loretha Georgia (10.3×), Florida (9.2×), Mississippi (5.3×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lora and Loretha.