Humanverse

Lou vs Louella

American parents have registered 38,198 Lous since 1880, against 13,958 Louellas. Lou is still ahead, with 146 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lou against Louella, 1880 to 2025 0 400 800 1.2k 1.6k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lou Louella

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Lou for 142 years and Louella for 4 years. The lead changed hands 5 times.

Side by side

  Lou Louella
Total US births 38,19813,958
Most in one year 1,547266
Babies in 2025 146146
Estimated living today 18,0004,800
Median age today 6969
Peak year 19541932
Best rank 204th girls401st girls
Rank in 2025 2,645th1,467th
First recorded 18801880
Girls / boys 34,109 / 4,08913,958 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Lou Louella
France 59,40080
England and Wales 84266

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lou and Louella.