Humanverse

Loxie vs Loxley

American parents have registered 622 Loxleys since 1880, against 46 Loxies. Loxley is still ahead, with 26 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Loxie against Loxley, 1880 to 2025 0 30 60 90 120 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Loxie Loxley

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 21 years in which either name was published, Loxley for 15 years and Loxie for 6 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Loxie Loxley
Total US births 46622
Most in one year 13114
Babies in 2025 under 526
Estimated living today 30620
Median age today 816
Peak year 19432017
Best rank 2,558th girls2,184th girls
Rank in 2025 unranked4,987th
First recorded 19422010
Girls / boys 46 / 0488 / 134

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Loxies alive today are over 81; half the Loxleys are over 6. That is 75 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Loxie Loxley
England and Wales 22213

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Loxie and Loxley.